360/PS3 Dungeon Siege III
- Ersteller funGus
- Erstellt am
Benutzer, welche sich diesen Thread anschauen:
Schaut mal folgendes Video. Zeigt die kürzlich erschienene Xbox Demo. Dafür, dass die Konsolenversionen grafisch schlechter sein sollten, sieht das Ganze sehr stimmig aus.
[vid]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fP8McaPyuk[/vid]
[vid]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fP8McaPyuk[/vid]
G
Gelöschte Mitglieder 688
Gast
Angelina Jolie ... bei min 25:50 
Ich fand den unglaublich nervig und hab nach einer Minute den Ton ausgestellt. 
Faultier schrieb:Weiß man denn schon nun die Knackpunkte die für 70er Wertungen gesorgt haben?
- Framerate stabil ??
- Möglichkeit seine Punkte zu resetten??
edti:
GamePro vergibt 85 %.
Ein Lichtblick
M!Games dagegen nur 74 %. PS3 und Xbox Version sollen sich nicht unterscheiden und die Grafikwertung liegt mit 5/10 im unteren Durchschnitt.
Anubis schrieb:
Stimme Dir bei diesem Punkt voll und ganz zu. Finde es ebenfalls sehr stimmig, und vor allen Dingen läuft es flüssig. Hoffentlich wird die Demo am kommenden Dienstag auch für Silber-Mitglieder freigeschaltet. Dann kann ich mir wenigstens selbst ein Bild von DS3 machen.
http://forums.obsidian.net/index.php?showtopic=57432
Zitat:
You control a character in the host's game, and that XP/progress is saved with the host's. So you do gain XP, but you don't take it back into your local game.
If you continue to play with the host, however, you will always have your progress/loot/etc.
Mp und Sp sind auch getrennt Sp kann man ja auch coop zocken^^, und das selbe prinzip haben sie für den Mp gewählt der Host hat alle daten. Es ist wie als wenn man offline mit 4 man an einer konsole zocken könnte, nur halt online ein speicherstand für alle ohne host kein game^^.
Zitat:
It actually boils down to a very simple design decision. Do you build an online multiplayer experience where the main point is to create, keep and build your character? Or do you build a co-operative system where the main point is to experience an instance of the game together with other people? Diablo 2 is an example of the former, and then all the other design decisions follow from that - i.e. you have 'New Game+' modes to grind your character up to level 99, you have a threadbare story and a modular campaign design so it never matters that you might jump all over the plotline or kill the same boss 500 times. On the other hand, you don't expect this from BG: Dark Alliance, some of the LOTR games, heck, even a Halo co-op campaign (which, from my experience, is kept separate from its online multiplayer). In a pure co-operative experience you see design decisions that are about helping make it easy for people to play together and keep up together and experience the story and gameplay together.
As C2B says it's not an online focused ARPG, and it seems that it never has been. I'd suggest Obsidian were quite foolish to not have made this crystal clear earlier on - they should have learned from AP that when people expect your game to be something different they get pissed off. But the design decision itself is perfectly fine - DS3 simply belongs to a different type/genre than, say, Diablo 2.
Personally I wouldn't have minded either way, online MP or co-op. But if DS3 were to go the online MP route, a million things about the game would need to be changed. The level cap is 30 right now - what's the point of keeping a single player running around if he will max that early? The game is story-heavy and with lots of dialogue - that will get really really boring if you want to grind a boss 500 times Mephisto-style. So on and so forth. If we keep DS3 as the game it is now, then just change it so you can carry across your characters, what changes, really? That won't make this game WOW or Diablo 2, like some people want.
Damit ist das spiel für mich gestorben
Zitat:
You control a character in the host's game, and that XP/progress is saved with the host's. So you do gain XP, but you don't take it back into your local game.
If you continue to play with the host, however, you will always have your progress/loot/etc.
Mp und Sp sind auch getrennt Sp kann man ja auch coop zocken^^, und das selbe prinzip haben sie für den Mp gewählt der Host hat alle daten. Es ist wie als wenn man offline mit 4 man an einer konsole zocken könnte, nur halt online ein speicherstand für alle ohne host kein game^^.
Zitat:
It actually boils down to a very simple design decision. Do you build an online multiplayer experience where the main point is to create, keep and build your character? Or do you build a co-operative system where the main point is to experience an instance of the game together with other people? Diablo 2 is an example of the former, and then all the other design decisions follow from that - i.e. you have 'New Game+' modes to grind your character up to level 99, you have a threadbare story and a modular campaign design so it never matters that you might jump all over the plotline or kill the same boss 500 times. On the other hand, you don't expect this from BG: Dark Alliance, some of the LOTR games, heck, even a Halo co-op campaign (which, from my experience, is kept separate from its online multiplayer). In a pure co-operative experience you see design decisions that are about helping make it easy for people to play together and keep up together and experience the story and gameplay together.
As C2B says it's not an online focused ARPG, and it seems that it never has been. I'd suggest Obsidian were quite foolish to not have made this crystal clear earlier on - they should have learned from AP that when people expect your game to be something different they get pissed off. But the design decision itself is perfectly fine - DS3 simply belongs to a different type/genre than, say, Diablo 2.
Personally I wouldn't have minded either way, online MP or co-op. But if DS3 were to go the online MP route, a million things about the game would need to be changed. The level cap is 30 right now - what's the point of keeping a single player running around if he will max that early? The game is story-heavy and with lots of dialogue - that will get really really boring if you want to grind a boss 500 times Mephisto-style. So on and so forth. If we keep DS3 as the game it is now, then just change it so you can carry across your characters, what changes, really? That won't make this game WOW or Diablo 2, like some people want.
Damit ist das spiel für mich gestorben
Master-Dan
... more EXP!!!
Ab nächstem Wochenende! 
G
Gelöschte Mitglieder 688
Gast
Ich werd noch ne Review abwarten und dann entscheiden...
Ähnliche Themen
