Uff, also wenn überproportional viele Dullis in die Bahn einsteigen weißte, du bist am Hbf Düsseldorf.
Kann aber absolut nachvollziehen dass man eine Großstadt vermisst wenn man dort länger gewohnt hat und nun in nem Dorf.
Der Boulevardpresse Thread
- Ersteller FLip
- Erstellt am
Benutzer, welche sich diesen Thread anschauen:
Uff, also wenn überproportional viele Dullis in die Bahn einsteigen weißte, du bist am Hbf Düsseldorf.
Kann aber absolut nachvollziehen dass man eine Großstadt vermisst wenn man dort länger gewohnt hat und nun in nem Dorf.
Du alles gut. Das war auch eig nichts gegen die Städte. Ich hasse einfach Karneval
Nuwanda
Stay retro ... wherever you are !
SpaceX employee letter: Musk’s behavior is “frequent source of embarrassment” [arstechnica.com]
SpaceX employees are circulating a letter that urges company executives to condemn CEO Elon Musk's public behavior. The letter was reported today and published in full by The Verge, which said it was shared Wednesday "in an internal SpaceX Microsoft Teams channel with more than 2,600 employees."
The letter says executives should "publicly address and condemn Elon's harmful Twitter behavior."
[...]
The letter circulated by employees doesn't make any further reference to the sexual misconduct allegation against Musk. It doesn't cite any specific Musk tweets, but it says that "Elon's behavior in the public sphere is a frequent source of distraction and embarrassment for us, particularly in recent weeks. As our CEO and most prominent spokesperson, Elon is seen as the face of SpaceX—every Tweet that Elon sends is a de facto public statement by the company. It is critical to make clear to our teams and to our potential talent pool that his messaging does not reflect our work, our mission, or our values."
Ein Tag später:
SpaceX fires employees who wrote open letter complaining about Elon Musk [theverge.com]
SpaceX has fired a number of employees who wrote and shared a letter criticizing the behavior of CEO Elon Musk, with the company’s president criticizing the letter as “overreaching activism.”
[...]
A number of the letter’s drafters were fired Thursday afternoon, according to an email sent by SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell and seen by The Verge. News of the firing was first reported by The New York Times.
In the email, Shotwell said SpaceX had “terminated a number of employees involved” in crafting the letter. “The letter, solicitations and general process made employees feel uncomfortable, intimidated and bullied, and/or angry because the letter pressured them to sign onto something that did not reflect their views,” wrote Shotwell. “We have too much critical work to accomplish and no need for this kind of overreaching activism.”
Wassen Held der Elon do is.
SpaceX employees are circulating a letter that urges company executives to condemn CEO Elon Musk's public behavior. The letter was reported today and published in full by The Verge, which said it was shared Wednesday "in an internal SpaceX Microsoft Teams channel with more than 2,600 employees."
The letter says executives should "publicly address and condemn Elon's harmful Twitter behavior."
[...]
The letter circulated by employees doesn't make any further reference to the sexual misconduct allegation against Musk. It doesn't cite any specific Musk tweets, but it says that "Elon's behavior in the public sphere is a frequent source of distraction and embarrassment for us, particularly in recent weeks. As our CEO and most prominent spokesperson, Elon is seen as the face of SpaceX—every Tweet that Elon sends is a de facto public statement by the company. It is critical to make clear to our teams and to our potential talent pool that his messaging does not reflect our work, our mission, or our values."
Ein Tag später:
SpaceX fires employees who wrote open letter complaining about Elon Musk [theverge.com]
SpaceX has fired a number of employees who wrote and shared a letter criticizing the behavior of CEO Elon Musk, with the company’s president criticizing the letter as “overreaching activism.”
[...]
A number of the letter’s drafters were fired Thursday afternoon, according to an email sent by SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell and seen by The Verge. News of the firing was first reported by The New York Times.
In the email, Shotwell said SpaceX had “terminated a number of employees involved” in crafting the letter. “The letter, solicitations and general process made employees feel uncomfortable, intimidated and bullied, and/or angry because the letter pressured them to sign onto something that did not reflect their views,” wrote Shotwell. “We have too much critical work to accomplish and no need for this kind of overreaching activism.”
Wassen Held der Elon do is.
Mondknallschlumpf
Forenleiche
Früher oder später wirkt sich ein vergiftetes Arbeitsklima aber auch auf die Ergebnisse aus. Vor allem in einer Hightech Branche.
Hobiologe
Ehemals n385055
14 Jahre Tesla beweisen das Gegenteil. Der Typ war schon immer so …
Mondknallschlumpf
Forenleiche
Wer weiß das schon. Vielleicht gäbe es sonst schon das Tesla full self driving, das nie kommen wird .
.Wenn wir schon bei Tesla sind, erst vor wenigen Tagen: NHTSA Finds Teslas Deactivated Autopilot Seconds Before Crashes.
A NHTSA report on its investigation into crashes in which Tesla vehicles equipped with the automaker's Autopilot driver assistance feature hit stationary emergency vehicles has unearthed a troubling detail: In 16 of those crashes, "on average," Autopilot was running but "aborted vehicle control less than one second prior to the first impact."
That line will send Tesla skeptics into a tizzy, given how Tesla (well, its CEO, Elon Musk) has been suggesting that crashes involving Autopilot or its new (not-ready-for-prime-time) Full Self Driving "autonomous" driving feature are due to driver error or misuse. The obvious subtext is that Tesla seems to be blaming drivers despite, at least in these sixteen high-profile emergency vehicle crashes—in which Teslas rammed into stopped emergency vehicles alongside roadways or in active lanes, incidents NHTSA found on average would have been identifiable by a human up to 8 seconds ahead of time—Autopilot was running but then shut off just a second before the impact.
[...]
Regardless, those thinking the ghost in the machine punting control to hapless, inattentive drivers just before impact is indicative of Tesla trying to gin up a "blame-the-driver" defense need remember only one thing: Autopilot, despite its name, is a driver assistance feature. It is intended to be used with driver supervision, meaning the driver, who may not need to intervene with the system's operation of the accelerator, brakes, and steering nonetheless needs to be keeping an eye on the proceedings. In other words, even if Autopilot were programmed to sandbag drivers so Tesla could wash its hands of responsibility in the event of a system failure, the driver is supposed to be paying attention to what's in front of the vehicle. Even if Autopilot kept running all the way until impact, that'd still be the case, meaning Tesla could still in good faith blame the driver.
Of course, things aren't that simple. Tesla has repeatedly marketed Autopilot in such a way that suggests its capabilities are greater than they are, often by not correcting popular thinking that the system truly is like a self-driving, well, autopilot feature. The company practically needed to be dragged into making driver prompts and safety blurbs noting how the driver needs to pay attention more visible inside their cars.
So, where does that leave the mysterious half-second-or-so Autopilot shutoff just before these crashes? In all likelihood, it's probably a simple protocol to shut off the system because a crash is about to occur. Plenty of new cars feature last-ditch shutoffs and other preemptive actions that occur just before or during impact; think about seatbelts that cinch up so occupants are seated more safely, or fuel-line disconnects, or some of the fancy new suspension actions Audi's A8 is capable of such as lifting one side of the car just before it's T-boned to place more of the crash structure in the path of the impact.
Kann sein um Personensicherheit zu gewähren bei einem Unfall, kann auch sein um Behörden zu täuschen bzgl. Unfallaufklärung.
A NHTSA report on its investigation into crashes in which Tesla vehicles equipped with the automaker's Autopilot driver assistance feature hit stationary emergency vehicles has unearthed a troubling detail: In 16 of those crashes, "on average," Autopilot was running but "aborted vehicle control less than one second prior to the first impact."
That line will send Tesla skeptics into a tizzy, given how Tesla (well, its CEO, Elon Musk) has been suggesting that crashes involving Autopilot or its new (not-ready-for-prime-time) Full Self Driving "autonomous" driving feature are due to driver error or misuse. The obvious subtext is that Tesla seems to be blaming drivers despite, at least in these sixteen high-profile emergency vehicle crashes—in which Teslas rammed into stopped emergency vehicles alongside roadways or in active lanes, incidents NHTSA found on average would have been identifiable by a human up to 8 seconds ahead of time—Autopilot was running but then shut off just a second before the impact.
[...]
Regardless, those thinking the ghost in the machine punting control to hapless, inattentive drivers just before impact is indicative of Tesla trying to gin up a "blame-the-driver" defense need remember only one thing: Autopilot, despite its name, is a driver assistance feature. It is intended to be used with driver supervision, meaning the driver, who may not need to intervene with the system's operation of the accelerator, brakes, and steering nonetheless needs to be keeping an eye on the proceedings. In other words, even if Autopilot were programmed to sandbag drivers so Tesla could wash its hands of responsibility in the event of a system failure, the driver is supposed to be paying attention to what's in front of the vehicle. Even if Autopilot kept running all the way until impact, that'd still be the case, meaning Tesla could still in good faith blame the driver.
Of course, things aren't that simple. Tesla has repeatedly marketed Autopilot in such a way that suggests its capabilities are greater than they are, often by not correcting popular thinking that the system truly is like a self-driving, well, autopilot feature. The company practically needed to be dragged into making driver prompts and safety blurbs noting how the driver needs to pay attention more visible inside their cars.
So, where does that leave the mysterious half-second-or-so Autopilot shutoff just before these crashes? In all likelihood, it's probably a simple protocol to shut off the system because a crash is about to occur. Plenty of new cars feature last-ditch shutoffs and other preemptive actions that occur just before or during impact; think about seatbelts that cinch up so occupants are seated more safely, or fuel-line disconnects, or some of the fancy new suspension actions Audi's A8 is capable of such as lifting one side of the car just before it's T-boned to place more of the crash structure in the path of the impact.
Kann sein um Personensicherheit zu gewähren bei einem Unfall, kann auch sein um Behörden zu täuschen bzgl. Unfallaufklärung.
Zuletzt bearbeitet:
Und das sagt die NHTSA selbst dazu :
NHTSA said the figures shouldn’t be used to make safety conclusions; The data lacks contextual information needed to establish a rate of incidents, such as number of vehicles in each manufacturer’s fleet that were equipped, how often drivers use them, or the # of miles driven.
NHTSA said the figures shouldn’t be used to make safety conclusions; The data lacks contextual information needed to establish a rate of incidents, such as number of vehicles in each manufacturer’s fleet that were equipped, how often drivers use them, or the # of miles driven.
Hallo lieber Tesla-Werbebot. 11 Beiträge in einem Videospieleforum und alle über Tesla bzw. wie toll Tesla doch ist. Wassen Zufall. 
Welches aber nur im Stau funktioniert,nur tagsüber, nicht bei Regen, bis max. 60kmh.
dweezzu
geiler Tÿp
Hallo lieber Tesla-Werbebot. 11 Beiträge in einem Videospieleforum und alle über Tesla bzw. wie toll Tesla doch ist. Wassen Zufall.
Das mit den Bots wird zu oft geschlussfolgert, da man ja schon so häufig gelesen hat wie viele der User (der politischen Gegenseite) lediglich Meinungsmacher-Bots wären. In Wahrheit ist die Zahl wohl gar nicht so groß.
https://www.spektrum.de/news/forscher-klassifizieren-haeufig-social-bots-auf-twitter-falsch/1734898
Und wir wissen alle, dass das hier auch kein Wunderwerk der KI-Forschung ist, sondern Account Nr. 641
